The Monk Study Guide
Color Theme
Font Style
Sans Serif System Mono Accessible
Text Size

Preface

Chapter Summary

The Preface to The Monk opens with a verse imitation of Horace's Epistle 20, in which the author addresses his book as a vain creature eager to be published and displayed in London's bookselling district. He prophesies the book's likely fate—neglect, mockery, and physical degradation—while offering a self-portrait: a passionate, proud, obstinate young man barely twenty years old, writing from The Hague in October 1794.

A short prose Advertisement follows, in which Lewis acknowledges the literary sources behind key elements of the novel: the story of Santon Barsisa from The Guardian, the German legend of the Bleeding Nun, a fragment of a Danish ballad for the Water-King, and a Spanish poem for Belerma and Durandarte. He openly confesses these borrowings and admits further unacknowledged debts may exist.

Translation Style
✨ Character Voice Translations PREMIUM
Original Text
IMITATION OF HORACE Ep. 20.—B. 1. Methinks, Oh! vain ill-judging Book, I see thee cast a wishful look, Where reputations won and lost are In famous row called Paternoster. Incensed to find your precious olio Buried in unexplored port-folio, You scorn the prudent lock and key, And pant well bound and gilt to see Your Volume in the window set Of Stockdale, Hookham, or Debrett. Go then, and pass that dangerous bourn Whence never Book can back return: And when you find, condemned, despised, Neglected, blamed, and criticised, Abuse from All who read you fall, (If haply you be read at all Sorely will you your folly sigh at, And wish for me, and home, and quiet. Assuming now a conjuror’s office, I Thus on your future Fortune prophesy:— Soon as your novelty is o’er, And you are young and new no more, In some dark dirty corner thrown, Mouldy with damps, with cobwebs strown, Your leaves shall be the Book-worm’s prey; Or sent to Chandler-Shop away, And doomed to suffer public scandal, Shall line the trunk, or wrap the candle! But should you meet with approbation, And some one find an inclination To ask, by natural transition Respecting me and my condition; That I am one, the enquirer teach, Nor very poor, nor very rich; Of passions strong, of hasty nature, Of graceless form and dwarfish stature; By few approved, and few approving; Extreme in hating and in loving; Abhorring all whom I dislike, Adoring who my fancy strike; In forming judgements never long, And for the most part judging wrong; In friendship firm, but still believing Others are treacherous and deceiving, And thinking in the present aera That Friendship is a pure chimaera: More passionate no creature living, Proud, obstinate, and unforgiving, But yet for those who kindness show, Ready through fire and smoke to go. Again, should it be asked your page, “Pray, what may be the author’s age?” Your faults, no doubt, will make it clear, I scarce have seen my twentieth year, Which passed, kind Reader, on my word, While England’s Throne held George the Third. Now then your venturous course pursue: Go, my delight! Dear Book, adieu! M. G. L. Hague, Oct. 28, 1794. ADVERTISEMENT The first idea of this Romance was suggested by the story of the _Santon Barsisa_, related in The Guardian.—The _Bleeding Nun_ is a tradition still credited in many parts of Germany; and I have been told that the ruins of the Castle of _Lauenstein_, which She is supposed to haunt, may yet be seen upon the borders of _Thuringia.—The Water-King_, from the third to the twelfth stanza, is the fragment of an original Danish Ballad—And _Belerma and Durandarte_ is translated from some stanzas to be found in a collection of old Spanish poetry, which contains also the popular song of _Gayferos and Melesindra_, mentioned in Don Quixote.—I have now made a full avowal of all the plagiarisms of which I am aware myself; but I doubt not, many more may be found, of which I am at present totally unconscious.
Source text: Project Gutenberg #601. Public domain worldwide.
Modern English
Select a style above to load the modern English translation.

Lewis's choice to open with a verse imitation of Horace's Epistles immediately signals literary self-consciousness: the author is not merely writing a Gothic thriller but positioning himself within a classical tradition of authorial address. The conceit of the book as an autonomous, vain agent—eager for the shop windows of Paternoster Row—allows Lewis to perform mock-heroic irony, deflating his own ambitions even as he indulges them. The prophesied fates (lining trunks, wrapping candles) invoke the Augustan tradition of satirising literary vanity, most famously in Pope's Dunciad, and establish a tone of wry self-deprecation that complicates any straightforward reading of the novel as naive sensationalism.

The self-portrait embedded in stanzas four and five is one of the Preface's most revealing passages. Lewis constructs an authorial persona defined by extremity and contradiction: passionate yet mistrustful, loyal yet convinced of universal treachery, proud yet self-mocking. This portrait anticipates the psychological landscape of the novel itself, where characters are similarly torn between devotion and transgression. The admission that he is "for the most part judging wrong" introduces an epistemological instability that will pervade the narrative—readers are subtly warned that moral certainty is elusive.

The Advertisement performs a different but equally significant rhetorical function: it is an act of preemptive confession. By cataloguing his sources—Horace, The Guardian, German legend, Danish ballad, Spanish romance—Lewis frames the novel as a composite text, a deliberate assemblage of European traditions. His candid admission that "many more may be found, of which I am at present totally unconscious" is disarmingly honest and gestures toward the Romantic-era anxiety about originality. Rather than concealing influence, Lewis transforms intertextuality into a structural principle, suggesting that Gothic fiction is by nature a literature of inheritance and recombination.

The geographical and temporal markers—The Hague, October 1794, George III on the throne—anchor the text in a specific historical moment, the revolutionary 1790s, lending the book's transgressive content an implicit political charge. A young Englishman writing abroad during the French Revolution and producing a novel about the corruption of religious authority is a culturally loaded figure. The dating of the authorial voice thus functions as more than biographical footnote; it situates the novel's anxieties about institutional power within a recognisable historical crisis.

Taken together, the verse epistle and the Advertisement establish the Preface as a sophisticated paratextual threshold. They manage reader expectation, construct an authorial persona, legitimise the novel's sensational content through classical and folkloric precedent, and introduce the themes of pride, self-deception, and moral fallibility that will drive the narrative. Far from being a perfunctory opening, the Preface is a carefully engineered act of literary positioning.

Loading quotes...

Loading tags...

Ask the Reader

Click any tag to explore where it appears across the book, then ask the Reader to explain how it works in this chapter.

Exploring tag...
The Reader's Take
Ask the Reader to explain how this element appears in this chapter
Click a tag to search.
Ask the Reader about this chapter
Type at least 2 characters to search
Characters & Figures
Loading figures...
✎ Mr. Shifflett's Note
SIS Teachers
Sign in with your @siskorea.org email for free full access to this guide and all GradeWise study guides — every chapter, translation, and premium feature.
Sign In with SIS Email