The Island of Doctor Moreau Study Guide
Color Theme
Font Style
Sans Serif System Mono Accessible
Text Size

Chapter XV — Concerning the Beast Folk

Chapter Summary

Prendick wakes with Moreau's explanation fresh in his mind and cautiously checks his locks before admitting M'ling with breakfast. Over the meal, Montgomery explains how the Beast Folk are controlled: Moreau has hypnotically implanted a set of prohibitions—the Law—that bound their imaginations, though instinct perpetually wars against these constraints, especially after dark. Prendick learns that the island spans seven or eight square miles and houses over sixty of Moreau's creations, many of whom have died or been killed.

Prendick then catalogues the Beast Folk in detail—their malformed limbs, prognathous faces, deficient hands, and varied voices—before reflecting on how prolonged exposure gradually normalises their appearance to him. He observes Montgomery's unsettling affection for the creatures, particularly M'ling, and notes that moments of sudden animal revelation—bared canines, slit pupils, curving nails—still break through the human veneer without warning.

Translation Style
✨ Character Voice Translations PREMIUM
Original Text
I woke early. Moreau’s explanation stood before my mind, clear and definite, from the moment of my awakening. I got out of the hammock and went to the door to assure myself that the key was turned. Then I tried the window-bar, and found it firmly fixed. That these man-like creatures were in truth only bestial monsters, mere grotesque travesties of men, filled me with a vague uncertainty of their possibilities which was far worse than any definite fear. A tapping came at the door, and I heard the glutinous accents of M’ling speaking. I pocketed one of the revolvers (keeping one hand upon it), and opened to him. “Good-morning, sair,” he said, bringing in, in addition to the customary herb-breakfast, an ill-cooked rabbit. Montgomery followed him. His roving eye caught the position of my arm and he smiled askew. The puma was resting to heal that day; but Moreau, who was singularly solitary in his habits, did not join us. I talked with Montgomery to clear my ideas of the way in which the Beast Folk lived. In particular, I was urgent to know how these inhuman monsters were kept from falling upon Moreau and Montgomery and from rending one another. He explained to me that the comparative safety of Moreau and himself was due to the limited mental scope of these monsters. In spite of their increased intelligence and the tendency of their animal instincts to reawaken, they had certain fixed ideas implanted by Moreau in their minds, which absolutely bounded their imaginations. They were really hypnotised; had been told that certain things were impossible, and that certain things were not to be done, and these prohibitions were woven into the texture of their minds beyond any possibility of disobedience or dispute. Certain matters, however, in which old instinct was at war with Moreau’s convenience, were in a less stable condition. A series of propositions called the Law (I had already heard them recited) battled in their minds with the deep-seated, ever-rebellious cravings of their animal natures. This Law they were ever repeating, I found, and ever breaking. Both Montgomery and Moreau displayed particular solicitude to keep them ignorant of the taste of blood; they feared the inevitable suggestions of that flavour. Montgomery told me that the Law, especially among the feline Beast People, became oddly weakened about nightfall; that then the animal was at its strongest; that a spirit of adventure sprang up in them at the dusk, when they would dare things they never seemed to dream about by day. To that I owed my stalking by the Leopard-man, on the night of my arrival. But during these earlier days of my stay they broke the Law only furtively and after dark; in the daylight there was a general atmosphere of respect for its multifarious prohibitions. And here perhaps I may give a few general facts about the island and the Beast People. The island, which was of irregular outline and lay low upon the wide sea, had a total area, I suppose, of seven or eight square miles.[2] It was volcanic in origin, and was now fringed on three sides by coral reefs; some fumaroles to the northward, and a hot spring, were the only vestiges of the forces that had long since originated it. Now and then a faint quiver of earthquake would be sensible, and sometimes the ascent of the spire of smoke would be rendered tumultuous by gusts of steam; but that was all. The population of the island, Montgomery informed me, now numbered rather more than sixty of these strange creations of Moreau’s art, not counting the smaller monstrosities which lived in the undergrowth and were without human form. Altogether he had made nearly a hundred and twenty; but many had died, and others—like the writhing Footless Thing of which he had told me—had come by violent ends. In answer to my question, Montgomery said that they actually bore offspring, but that these generally died. When they lived, Moreau took them and stamped the human form upon them. There was no evidence of the inheritance of their acquired human characteristics. The females were less numerous than the males, and liable to much furtive persecution in spite of the monogamy the Law enjoined. [2]This description corresponds in every respect to Noble’s Isle.—C. E. P. It would be impossible for me to describe these Beast People in detail; my eye has had no training in details, and unhappily I cannot sketch. Most striking, perhaps, in their general appearance was the disproportion between the legs of these creatures and the length of their bodies; and yet—so relative is our idea of grace—my eye became habituated to their forms, and at last I even fell in with their persuasion that my own long thighs were ungainly. Another point was the forward carriage of the head and the clumsy and inhuman curvature of the spine. Even the Ape-man lacked that inward sinuous curve of the back which makes the human figure so graceful. Most had their shoulders hunched clumsily, and their short forearms hung weakly at their sides. Few of them were conspicuously hairy, at least until the end of my time upon the island. The next most obvious deformity was in their faces, almost all of which were prognathous, malformed about the ears, with large and protuberant noses, very furry or very bristly hair, and often strangely-coloured or strangely-placed eyes. None could laugh, though the Ape-man had a chattering titter. Beyond these general characters their heads had little in common; each preserved the quality of its particular species: the human mark distorted but did not hide the leopard, the ox, or the sow, or other animal or animals, from which the creature had been moulded. The voices, too, varied exceedingly. The hands were always malformed; and though some surprised me by their unexpected human appearance, almost all were deficient in the number of the digits, clumsy about the finger-nails, and lacking any tactile sensibility. The two most formidable Animal Men were my Leopard-man and a creature made of hyena and swine. Larger than these were the three bull-creatures who pulled in the boat. Then came the silvery-hairy-man, who was also the Sayer of the Law, M’ling, and a satyr-like creature of ape and goat. There were three Swine-men and a Swine-woman, a mare-rhinoceros-creature, and several other females whose sources I did not ascertain. There were several wolf-creatures, a bear-bull, and a Saint-Bernard-man. I have already described the Ape-man, and there was a particularly hateful (and evil-smelling) old woman made of vixen and bear, whom I hated from the beginning. She was said to be a passionate votary of the Law. Smaller creatures were certain dappled youths and my little sloth-creature. But enough of this catalogue. At first I had a shivering horror of the brutes, felt all too keenly that they were still brutes; but insensibly I became a little habituated to the idea of them, and moreover I was affected by Montgomery’s attitude towards them. He had been with them so long that he had come to regard them as almost normal human beings. His London days seemed a glorious, impossible past to him. Only once in a year or so did he go to Africa to deal with Moreau’s agent, a trader in animals there. He hardly met the finest type of mankind in that seafaring village of Spanish mongrels. The men aboard-ship, he told me, seemed at first just as strange to him as the Beast Men seemed to me,—unnaturally long in the leg, flat in the face, prominent in the forehead, suspicious, dangerous, and cold-hearted. In fact, he did not like men: his heart had warmed to me, he thought, because he had saved my life. I fancied even then that he had a sneaking kindness for some of these metamorphosed brutes, a vicious sympathy with some of their ways, but that he attempted to veil it from me at first. M’ling, the black-faced man, Montgomery’s attendant, the first of the Beast Folk I had encountered, did not live with the others across the island, but in a small kennel at the back of the enclosure. The creature was scarcely so intelligent as the Ape-man, but far more docile, and the most human-looking of all the Beast Folk; and Montgomery had trained it to prepare food, and indeed to discharge all the trivial domestic offices that were required. It was a complex trophy of Moreau’s horrible skill,—a bear, tainted with dog and ox, and one of the most elaborately made of all his creatures. It treated Montgomery with a strange tenderness and devotion. Sometimes he would notice it, pat it, call it half-mocking, half-jocular names, and so make it caper with extraordinary delight; sometimes he would ill-treat it, especially after he had been at the whiskey, kicking it, beating it, pelting it with stones or lighted fusees. But whether he treated it well or ill, it loved nothing so much as to be near him. I say I became habituated to the Beast People, that a thousand things which had seemed unnatural and repulsive speedily became natural and ordinary to me. I suppose everything in existence takes its colour from the average hue of our surroundings. Montgomery and Moreau were too peculiar and individual to keep my general impressions of humanity well defined. I would see one of the clumsy bovine-creatures who worked the launch treading heavily through the undergrowth, and find myself asking, trying hard to recall, how he differed from some really human yokel trudging home from his mechanical labours; or I would meet the Fox-bear woman’s vulpine, shifty face, strangely human in its speculative cunning, and even imagine I had met it before in some city byway. Yet every now and then the beast would flash out upon me beyond doubt or denial. An ugly-looking man, a hunch-backed human savage to all appearance, squatting in the aperture of one of the dens, would stretch his arms and yawn, showing with startling suddenness scissor-edged incisors and sabre-like canines, keen and brilliant as knives. Or in some narrow pathway, glancing with a transitory daring into the eyes of some lithe, white-swathed female figure, I would suddenly see (with a spasmodic revulsion) that she had slit-like pupils, or glancing down note the curving nail with which she held her shapeless wrap about her. It is a curious thing, by the bye, for which I am quite unable to account, that these weird creatures—the females, I mean—had in the earlier days of my stay an instinctive sense of their own repulsive clumsiness, and displayed in consequence a more than human regard for the decency and decorum of extensive costume.
Source text: Project Gutenberg #159. Public domain worldwide.
Modern English
Select a style above to load the modern English translation.

Chapter XV functions as an expository pause that simultaneously deepens the novel's central anxieties. Wells uses Prendick's systematic catalogue of the Beast Folk to enact a kind of pseudo-scientific taxonomy, mimicking the detached language of Victorian natural history even as the subject matter subverts its assumptions. The clinical enumeration of deformities—prognathous faces, deficient digits, malformed spines—echoes the period's discourse on atavism and degeneration, most famously theorised by Cesare Lombroso, and invites readers to question where the boundary between the human and the bestial truly lies.

The chapter's most philosophically charged passage concerns habituation: Prendick confesses that the Beast Folk gradually cease to seem monstrous, and that he begins to see ordinary labourers and city-dwellers in their faces. This perceptual drift is not mere comic irony; it is Wells's sharpest critique of social normalisation. If the grotesque can become ordinary through familiarity, then the reverse is equally true—the ordinary may always harbour the grotesque. The Fox-bear woman's "vulpine, shifty face" that Prendick imagines meeting "in some city byway" collapses the distance between Moreau's island and Victorian London.

The Law operates in this chapter as both a social and a theological symbol. Its constant recitation and constant violation mirrors the Pauline paradox of law and sin: the prohibition itself awakens the desire it forbids. The detail that the Law weakens at nightfall, when "the animal was at its strongest," aligns moral failure with darkness in a way that draws on deep Gothic and biblical traditions, while also anticipating Freudian ideas about the unconscious as the site of repressed instinct. The Law is, in effect, a superego surgically installed—and surgically insufficient.

Montgomery's relationship with M'ling provides the chapter's most psychologically complex portrait. His alternation between tenderness and cruelty—petting the creature one moment, kicking it the next—is presented without authorial condemnation, which makes it more disturbing. M'ling's unconditional devotion despite abuse implicates not only Montgomery but the reader, who is invited to recognise analogous power dynamics in human relationships. Wells quietly suggests that dominion, whether over animals or colonised peoples, corrupts the one who wields it as surely as it degrades the one who suffers it.

Finally, the recurring motif of the sudden animal revelation—scissor-edged incisors, slit pupils, curving nails glimpsed in an unguarded moment—functions as a formal device that mirrors the chapter's thematic argument. Just as Prendick's habituated eye must be periodically shocked back into recognition, the reader is reminded that the text's surface of scientific reportage conceals a horror that cannot be fully domesticated. These flashes of the bestial are Wells's way of insisting that the human form is a mask, not a nature.

Loading quotes...

Loading tags...

Ask the Reader

Click any tag to explore where it appears across the book, then ask the Reader to explain how it works in this chapter.

Exploring tag...
The Reader's Take
Ask the Reader to explain how this element appears in this chapter
Click a tag to search.
Ask the Reader about this chapter
Type at least 2 characters to search
Characters & Figures
Loading figures...
✎ Mr. Shifflett's Note
SIS Teachers
Sign in with your @siskorea.org email for free full access to this guide and all GradeWise study guides — every chapter, translation, and premium feature.
Sign In with SIS Email