Anna Karenina Study Guide
Color Theme
Font Style
Sans Serif System Mono Accessible
Text Size

Part One, Chapter 11

Chapter Summary

Over dinner, Stepan Arkadyevitch informs Levin that Count Vronsky, a wealthy and handsome Petersburg officer, has arrived in Moscow and is in love with Kitty Shcherbatsky, making him Levin's rival. Levin is visibly shaken but tries to change the subject; Oblonsky advises him to propose to Kitty the following morning. Levin feels that speaking of his love to Oblonsky has cheapened it.

The conversation shifts to Oblonsky's own marital infidelity. He asks Levin's advice, but Levin responds with rigid moral condemnation, comparing fallen women to vermin. Oblonsky counters that life is made of 'light and shadow' and that Levin's all-or-nothing character is both his strength and his weakness. The two men fall into a mutual sense of alienation despite their friendship, and Levin departs to dress and go to the Shcherbatskys' to decide his fate.

Translation Style
✨ Character Voice Translations PREMIUM
Original Text
Levin emptied his glass, and they were silent for a while. “There’s one other thing I ought to tell you. Do you know Vronsky?” Stepan Arkadyevitch asked Levin. “No, I don’t. Why do you ask?” “Give us another bottle,” Stepan Arkadyevitch directed the Tatar, who was filling up their glasses and fidgeting round them just when he was not wanted. “Why you ought to know Vronsky is that he’s one of your rivals.” “Who’s Vronsky?” said Levin, and his face was suddenly transformed from the look of childlike ecstasy which Oblonsky had just been admiring to an angry and unpleasant expression. “Vronsky is one of the sons of Count Kirill Ivanovitch Vronsky, and one of the finest specimens of the gilded youth of Petersburg. I made his acquaintance in Tver when I was there on official business, and he came there for the levy of recruits. Fearfully rich, handsome, great connections, an aide-de-camp, and with all that a very nice, good-natured fellow. But he’s more than simply a good-natured fellow, as I’ve found out here—he’s a cultivated man, too, and very intelligent; he’s a man who’ll make his mark.” Levin scowled and was dumb. “Well, he turned up here soon after you’d gone, and as I can see, he’s over head and ears in love with Kitty, and you know that her mother....” “Excuse me, but I know nothing,” said Levin, frowning gloomily. And immediately he recollected his brother Nikolay and how hateful he was to have been able to forget him. “You wait a bit, wait a bit,” said Stepan Arkadyevitch, smiling and touching his hand. “I’ve told you what I know, and I repeat that in this delicate and tender matter, as far as one can conjecture, I believe the chances are in your favor.” Levin dropped back in his chair; his face was pale. “But I would advise you to settle the thing as soon as may be,” pursued Oblonsky, filling up his glass. “No, thanks, I can’t drink any more,” said Levin, pushing away his glass. “I shall be drunk.... Come, tell me how are you getting on?” he went on, obviously anxious to change the conversation. “One word more: in any case I advise you to settle the question soon. Tonight I don’t advise you to speak,” said Stepan Arkadyevitch. “Go round tomorrow morning, make an offer in due form, and God bless you....” “Oh, do you still think of coming to me for some shooting? Come next spring, do,” said Levin. Now his whole soul was full of remorse that he had begun this conversation with Stepan Arkadyevitch. A feeling such as his was profaned by talk of the rivalry of some Petersburg officer, of the suppositions and the counsels of Stepan Arkadyevitch. Stepan Arkadyevitch smiled. He knew what was passing in Levin’s soul. “I’ll come some day,” he said. “But women, my boy, they’re the pivot everything turns upon. Things are in a bad way with me, very bad. And it’s all through women. Tell me frankly now,” he pursued, picking up a cigar and keeping one hand on his glass; “give me your advice.” “Why, what is it?” “I’ll tell you. Suppose you’re married, you love your wife, but you’re fascinated by another woman....” “Excuse me, but I’m absolutely unable to comprehend how ... just as I can’t comprehend how I could now, after my dinner, go straight to a baker’s shop and steal a roll.” Stepan Arkadyevitch’s eyes sparkled more than usual. “Why not? A roll will sometimes smell so good one can’t resist it.” “Himmlisch ist’s, wenn ich bezwungen Meine irdische Begier; Aber doch wenn’s nich gelungen Hatt’ ich auch recht hübsch Plaisir!” As he said this, Stepan Arkadyevitch smiled subtly. Levin, too, could not help smiling. “Yes, but joking apart,” resumed Stepan Arkadyevitch, “you must understand that the woman is a sweet, gentle loving creature, poor and lonely, and has sacrificed everything. Now, when the thing’s done, don’t you see, can one possibly cast her off? Even supposing one parts from her, so as not to break up one’s family life, still, can one help feeling for her, setting her on her feet, softening her lot?” “Well, you must excuse me there. You know to me all women are divided into two classes ... at least no ... truer to say: there are women and there are ... I’ve never seen exquisite fallen beings, and I never shall see them, but such creatures as that painted Frenchwoman at the counter with the ringlets are vermin to my mind, and all fallen women are the same.” “But the Magdalen?” “Ah, drop that! Christ would never have said those words if He had known how they would be abused. Of all the Gospel those words are the only ones remembered. However, I’m not saying so much what I think, as what I feel. I have a loathing for fallen women. You’re afraid of spiders, and I of these vermin. Most likely you’ve not made a study of spiders and don’t know their character; and so it is with me.” “It’s very well for you to talk like that; it’s very much like that gentleman in Dickens who used to fling all difficult questions over his right shoulder. But to deny the facts is no answer. What’s to be done—you tell me that, what’s to be done? Your wife gets older, while you’re full of life. Before you’ve time to look round, you feel that you can’t love your wife with love, however much you may esteem her. And then all at once love turns up, and you’re done for, done for,” Stepan Arkadyevitch said with weary despair. Levin half smiled. “Yes, you’re done for,” resumed Oblonsky. “But what’s to be done?” “Don’t steal rolls.” Stepan Arkadyevitch laughed outright. “Oh, moralist! But you must understand, there are two women; one insists only on her rights, and those rights are your love, which you can’t give her; and the other sacrifices everything for you and asks for nothing. What are you to do? How are you to act? There’s a fearful tragedy in it.” “If you care for my profession of faith as regards that, I’ll tell you that I don’t believe there was any tragedy about it. And this is why. To my mind, love ... both the sorts of love, which you remember Plato defines in his Banquet, served as the test of men. Some men only understand one sort, and some only the other. And those who only know the non-platonic love have no need to talk of tragedy. In such love there can be no sort of tragedy. ‘I’m much obliged for the gratification, my humble respects’—that’s all the tragedy. And in platonic love there can be no tragedy, because in that love all is clear and pure, because....” At that instant Levin recollected his own sins and the inner conflict he had lived through. And he added unexpectedly: “But perhaps you are right. Very likely ... I don’t know, I don’t know.” “It’s this, don’t you see,” said Stepan Arkadyevitch, “you’re very much all of a piece. That’s your strong point and your failing. You have a character that’s all of a piece, and you want the whole of life to be of a piece too—but that’s not how it is. You despise public official work because you want the reality to be invariably corresponding all the while with the aim—and that’s not how it is. You want a man’s work, too, always to have a defined aim, and love and family life always to be undivided—and that’s not how it is. All the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow.” Levin sighed and made no reply. He was thinking of his own affairs, and did not hear Oblonsky. And suddenly both of them felt that though they were friends, though they had been dining and drinking together, which should have drawn them closer, yet each was thinking only of his own affairs, and they had nothing to do with one another. Oblonsky had more than once experienced this extreme sense of aloofness, instead of intimacy, coming on after dinner, and he knew what to do in such cases. “Bill!” he called, and he went into the next room where he promptly came across an aide-de-camp of his acquaintance and dropped into conversation with him about an actress and her protector. And at once in the conversation with the aide-de-camp Oblonsky had a sense of relaxation and relief after the conversation with Levin, which always put him to too great a mental and spiritual strain. When the Tatar appeared with a bill for twenty-six roubles and odd kopecks, besides a tip for himself, Levin, who would another time have been horrified, like anyone from the country, at his share of fourteen roubles, did not notice it, paid, and set off homewards to dress and go to the Shtcherbatskys’ there to decide his fate.
Source text: Project Gutenberg #1399. Public domain worldwide. Translated by Constance Garnett (1901)
Modern English
Select a style above to load the modern English translation.

This chapter functions as a pivotal character contrast between Levin and Oblonsky, using the intimate setting of a restaurant dinner to expose the philosophical gulf between them. Oblonsky's easy worldliness and Levin's intense moral absolutism are placed in direct collision, and Tolstoy structures the dialogue so that neither man fully wins the argument, lending the scene a productive ambiguity characteristic of the novel's ethical complexity.

The introduction of Vronsky as Levin's rival is handled with careful narrative economy. Oblonsky's glowing description of Vronsky as 'fearfully rich, handsome, great connections' is rendered in the language of social capital, the very currency Levin distrusts. Levin's face transforming from 'the look of childlike ecstasy' to 'an angry and unpleasant expression' is a telling piece of physiognomic characterization: Tolstoy consistently externalizes inner states through the body, and here jealousy is shown to be involuntary and instantaneous, undercutting Levin's self-image as a man of principle above social competition.

The debate about sexual morality and marital fidelity reveals the novel's larger thematic architecture. Levin's bread-roll analogy frames adultery as simple theft, a morally transparent act. Oblonsky's witty riposte, quoting a German verse about the pleasures of yielding to earthly desire, introduces a carnivalesque counter-voice that refuses to be silenced by Levin's earnestness. The allusion to Plato's Symposium and its two kinds of love allows Levin to articulate a high-minded ideal, but Tolstoy immediately undercuts it when Levin recollects his own sins and concedes 'But perhaps you are right.' This moment of self-awareness is crucial to Levin's characterization as a man perpetually in dialogue with his own conscience.

Oblonsky's diagnosis that Levin is 'very much all of a piece' functions almost as a thematic thesis statement for Levin's entire arc in the novel. The observation that 'all the variety, all the charm, all the beauty of life is made up of light and shadow' is Oblonsky's most philosophically serious utterance, and while it is partly self-serving, Tolstoy grants it genuine weight. The contrast between Oblonsky's acceptance of moral complexity and Levin's demand for coherence maps onto the novel's broader tension between idealism and lived experience.

The chapter closes with a quietly devastating moment of alienation: despite shared food, wine, and friendship, each man is thinking only of his own affairs. Oblonsky's relief at escaping into small talk with an aide-de-camp, and Levin's obliviousness to the restaurant bill he would normally have found shocking, together underscore how completely each man is absorbed in his own emotional world. The final image of Levin setting off to 'decide his fate' at the Shcherbatskys' charges the chapter's end with dramatic anticipation and frames the entire dinner conversation as a threshold moment before a life-altering action.

Loading quotes...

Loading tags...

Ask the Reader

Click any tag to explore where it appears across the book, then ask the Reader to explain how it works in this chapter.

Exploring tag...
The Reader's Take
Ask the Reader to explain how this element appears in this chapter
Click a tag to search.
Ask the Reader about this chapter
Type at least 2 characters to search
Characters & Figures
Loading figures...
✎ Mr. Shifflett's Note
SIS Teachers
Sign in with your @siskorea.org email for free full access to this guide and all GradeWise study guides — every chapter, translation, and premium feature.
Sign In with SIS Email