Anna Karenina Study Guide
Color Theme
Font Style
Sans Serif System Mono Accessible
Text Size

Part Eight, Chapter 16

Chapter Summary

During a gathering at Levin's estate, Sergey Ivanovitch argues that the educated public has united behind the Slavic cause, citing press unanimity as evidence of popular will. The old prince counters sardonically, suggesting the newspapers' enthusiasm is driven by wartime profits, and invokes Alphonse Karr's quip that war advocates should be sent to the front lines. Katavasov and Dolly join the banter, while Sergey Ivanovitch defends the press as a legitimate voice of public opinion.

Levin attempts to distinguish between the people's willingness to sacrifice for spiritual reasons and their unwillingness to kill, but is dismissed by Katavasov and overridden by Sergey Ivanovitch's citation of Christ's words. Feeling exposed and outmaneuvered in argument, Levin falls silent, inwardly rejecting the premise that intellectuals and newspapers can speak for the Russian people. He ends the debate by pointing to gathering storm clouds and suggesting the guests head indoors.

Translation Style
✨ Character Voice Translations PREMIUM
Original Text
Sergey Ivanovitch, being practiced in argument, did not reply, but at once turned the conversation to another aspect of the subject. “Oh, if you want to learn the spirit of the people by arithmetical computation, of course it’s very difficult to arrive at it. And voting has not been introduced among us and cannot be introduced, for it does not express the will of the people; but there are other ways of reaching that. It is felt in the air, it is felt by the heart. I won’t speak of those deep currents which are astir in the still ocean of the people, and which are evident to every unprejudiced man; let us look at society in the narrow sense. All the most diverse sections of the educated public, hostile before, are merged in one. Every division is at an end, all the public organs say the same thing over and over again, all feel the mighty torrent that has overtaken them and is carrying them in one direction.” “Yes, all the newspapers do say the same thing,” said the prince. “That’s true. But so it is the same thing that all the frogs croak before a storm. One can hear nothing for them.” “Frogs or no frogs, I’m not the editor of a paper and I don’t want to defend them; but I am speaking of the unanimity in the intellectual world,” said Sergey Ivanovitch, addressing his brother. Levin would have answered, but the old prince interrupted him. “Well, about that unanimity, that’s another thing, one may say,” said the prince. “There’s my son-in-law, Stepan Arkadyevitch, you know him. He’s got a place now on the committee of a commission and something or other, I don’t remember. Only there’s nothing to do in it—why, Dolly, it’s no secret!—and a salary of eight thousand. You try asking him whether his post is of use, he’ll prove to you that it’s most necessary. And he’s a truthful man too, but there’s no refusing to believe in the utility of eight thousand roubles.” “Yes, he asked me to give a message to Darya Alexandrovna about the post,” said Sergey Ivanovitch reluctantly, feeling the prince’s remark to be ill-timed. “So it is with the unanimity of the press. That’s been explained to me: as soon as there’s war their incomes are doubled. How can they help believing in the destinies of the people and the Slavonic races ... and all that?” “I don’t care for many of the papers, but that’s unjust,” said Sergey Ivanovitch. “I would only make one condition,” pursued the old prince. “Alphonse Karr said a capital thing before the war with Prussia: ‘You consider war to be inevitable? Very good. Let everyone who advocates war be enrolled in a special regiment of advance-guards, for the front of every storm, of every attack, to lead them all!’” “A nice lot the editors would make!” said Katavasov, with a loud roar, as he pictured the editors he knew in this picked legion. “But they’d run,” said Dolly, “they’d only be in the way.” “Oh, if they ran away, then we’d have grape-shot or Cossacks with whips behind them,” said the prince. “But that’s a joke, and a poor one too, if you’ll excuse my saying so, prince,” said Sergey Ivanovitch. “I don’t see that it was a joke, that....” Levin was beginning, but Sergey Ivanovitch interrupted him. “Every member of society is called upon to do his own special work,” said he. “And men of thought are doing their work when they express public opinion. And the single-hearted and full expression of public opinion is the service of the press and a phenomenon to rejoice us at the same time. Twenty years ago we should have been silent, but now we have heard the voice of the Russian people, which is ready to rise as one man and ready to sacrifice itself for its oppressed brethren; that is a great step and a proof of strength.” “But it’s not only making a sacrifice, but killing Turks,” said Levin timidly. “The people make sacrifices and are ready to make sacrifices for their soul, but not for murder,” he added, instinctively connecting the conversation with the ideas that had been absorbing his mind. “For their soul? That’s a most puzzling expression for a natural science man, do you understand? What sort of thing is the soul?” said Katavasov, smiling. “Oh, you know!” “No, by God, I haven’t the faintest idea!” said Katavasov with a loud roar of laughter. “‘I bring not peace, but a sword,’ says Christ,” Sergey Ivanovitch rejoined for his part, quoting as simply as though it were the easiest thing to understand the very passage that had always puzzled Levin most. “That’s so, no doubt,” the old man repeated again. He was standing near them and responded to a chance glance turned in his direction. “Ah, my dear fellow, you’re defeated, utterly defeated!” cried Katavasov good-humoredly. Levin reddened with vexation, not at being defeated, but at having failed to control himself and being drawn into argument. “No, I can’t argue with them,” he thought; “they wear impenetrable armor, while I’m naked.” He saw that it was impossible to convince his brother and Katavasov, and he saw even less possibility of himself agreeing with them. What they advocated was the very pride of intellect that had almost been his ruin. He could not admit that some dozens of men, among them his brother, had the right, on the ground of what they were told by some hundreds of glib volunteers swarming to the capital, to say that they and the newspapers were expressing the will and feeling of the people, and a feeling which was expressed in vengeance and murder. He could not admit this, because he neither saw the expression of such feelings in the people among whom he was living, nor found them in himself (and he could not but consider himself one of the persons making up the Russian people), and most of all because he, like the people, did not know and could not know what is for the general good, though he knew beyond a doubt that this general good could be attained only by the strict observance of that law of right and wrong which has been revealed to every man, and therefore he could not wish for war or advocate war for any general objects whatever. He said as Mihalitch did and the people, who had expressed their feeling in the traditional invitations of the Varyagi: “Be princes and rule over us. Gladly we promise complete submission. All the labor, all humiliations, all sacrifices we take upon ourselves; but we will not judge and decide.” And now, according to Sergey Ivanovitch’s account, the people had foregone this privilege they had bought at such a costly price. He wanted to say too that if public opinion were an infallible guide, then why were not revolutions and the commune as lawful as the movement in favor of the Slavonic peoples? But these were merely thoughts that could settle nothing. One thing could be seen beyond doubt—that was that at the actual moment the discussion was irritating Sergey Ivanovitch, and so it was wrong to continue it. And Levin ceased speaking and then called the attention of his guests to the fact that the storm clouds were gathering, and that they had better be going home before it rained.
Source text: Project Gutenberg #1399. Public domain worldwide. Translated by Constance Garnett (1901)
Modern English
Select a style above to load the modern English translation.

This chapter stages a dialectical confrontation between institutional intellectual authority and individual moral conscience. Sergey Ivanovitch and Katavasov represent the educated establishment, wielding rhetoric, citation, and social confidence as weapons; Levin, by contrast, is described as "naked" against their "impenetrable armor." Tolstoy uses this asymmetry not to discredit Levin but to dramatize how social consensus can silence genuine moral inquiry. The very fluency of Sergey Ivanovitch's arguments becomes suspect—his ease with scripture, his polished transitions—because it substitutes performance for truth.

The press as false oracle is a central satirical target. The prince's frog simile—newspapers croaking before a storm—deflates the claim that media unanimity reflects popular will, equating it with instinctive, meaningless noise. The Alphonse Karr allusion sharpens this critique: those who advocate war from safety are implicitly cowards, and the humor shared by Katavasov and Dolly underscores the gap between drawing-room patriotism and actual sacrifice. Tolstoy thus links intellectual vanity with moral irresponsibility.

Levin's interior monologue in the chapter's final paragraphs is its philosophical core. His distinction between sacrifice "for their soul" and sacrifice for "murder" introduces a spiritual ethics that transcends nationalist logic. His reference to the Varyagi—the legendary invitation to Rurik's dynasty—frames the Russian people as a community that willingly submits to governance while reserving moral judgment for God, not the state or press. This is Tolstoy's own Christian anarchist position in embryonic form, anticipating the essays he would write in the 1880s.

Sergey Ivanovitch's quotation of "I bring not peace, but a sword" (Matthew 10:34) is a pivotal moment of scriptural appropriation. Tolstoy notes it is the very passage that had "always puzzled Levin most," making its deployment by Sergey Ivanovitch feel like a rhetorical coup rather than genuine exegesis. The ease with which the verse is wielded to justify war exposes how sacred language can be conscripted into ideological service—a form of spiritual bad faith that Levin intuitively recognizes but cannot articulate in the moment.

The storm clouds that close the chapter function as a structural and symbolic resolution. Levin's gesture toward the weather is simultaneously a social retreat and a natural metaphor: the real storm gathering outside mirrors the unresolved ideological storm within. By choosing silence and the physical world over continued argument, Levin enacts the very principle he cannot verbalize—that lived, embodied experience outweighs abstract intellectual debate. This preference for the concrete over the rhetorical is one of Tolstoy's most persistent narrative values throughout the novel.

Loading quotes...

Loading tags...

Ask the Reader

Click any tag to explore where it appears across the book, then ask the Reader to explain how it works in this chapter.

Exploring tag...
The Reader's Take
Ask the Reader to explain how this element appears in this chapter
Click a tag to search.
Ask the Reader about this chapter
Type at least 2 characters to search
Characters & Figures
Loading figures...
✎ Mr. Shifflett's Note
SIS Teachers
Sign in with your @siskorea.org email for free full access to this guide and all GradeWise study guides — every chapter, translation, and premium feature.
Sign In with SIS Email