Anna Karenina Study Guide
Color Theme
Font Style
Sans Serif System Mono Accessible
Text Size

Part Eight, Chapter 8

Chapter Summary

Levin reflects on the spiritual crisis that has haunted him since witnessing his brother Nikolai's death. The materialist and scientific vocabulary he absorbed in place of childhood faith — evolution, conservation of energy, the indestructibility of matter — has left him feeling existentially exposed, like a man stripped of a fur coat in winter. Marriage and fatherhood temporarily suppressed these anxieties, but idleness in Moscow has brought them roaring back, crystallised in a single question: if Christianity's answers are rejected, what answers remain?

Levin surveys his situation and finds three unsettling facts: most educated men of his circle seem untroubled by the same godless convictions; the people he most respects morally are all believers; and during his wife's confinement he spontaneously prayed and, in that moment, believed — yet cannot reconcile that experience with his rational life. He is left miserably divided against himself.

Translation Style
✨ Character Voice Translations PREMIUM
Original Text
Ever since, by his beloved brother’s deathbed, Levin had first glanced into the questions of life and death in the light of these new convictions, as he called them, which had during the period from his twentieth to his thirty-fourth year imperceptibly replaced his childish and youthful beliefs—he had been stricken with horror, not so much of death, as of life, without any knowledge of whence, and why, and how, and what it was. The physical organization, its decay, the indestructibility of matter, the law of the conservation of energy, evolution, were the words which usurped the place of his old belief. These words and the ideas associated with them were very well for intellectual purposes. But for life they yielded nothing, and Levin felt suddenly like a man who has changed his warm fur cloak for a muslin garment, and going for the first time into the frost is immediately convinced, not by reason, but by his whole nature that he is as good as naked, and that he must infallibly perish miserably. From that moment, though he did not distinctly face it, and still went on living as before, Levin had never lost this sense of terror at his lack of knowledge. He vaguely felt, too, that what he called his new convictions were not merely lack of knowledge, but that they were part of a whole order of ideas, in which no knowledge of what he needed was possible. At first, marriage, with the new joys and duties bound up with it, had completely crowded out these thoughts. But of late, while he was staying in Moscow after his wife’s confinement, with nothing to do, the question that clamored for solution had more and more often, more and more insistently, haunted Levin’s mind. The question was summed up for him thus: “If I do not accept the answers Christianity gives to the problems of my life, what answers do I accept?” And in the whole arsenal of his convictions, so far from finding any satisfactory answers, he was utterly unable to find anything at all like an answer. He was in the position of a man seeking food in toy shops and tool shops. Instinctively, unconsciously, with every book, with every conversation, with every man he met, he was on the lookout for light on these questions and their solution. What puzzled and distracted him above everything was that the majority of men of his age and circle had, like him, exchanged their old beliefs for the same new convictions, and yet saw nothing to lament in this, and were perfectly satisfied and serene. So that, apart from the principal question, Levin was tortured by other questions too. Were these people sincere? he asked himself, or were they playing a part? or was it that they understood the answers science gave to these problems in some different, clearer sense than he did? And he assiduously studied both these men’s opinions and the books which treated of these scientific explanations. One fact he had found out since these questions had engrossed his mind, was that he had been quite wrong in supposing from the recollections of the circle of his young days at college, that religion had outlived its day, and that it was now practically non-existent. All the people nearest to him who were good in their lives were believers. The old prince, and Lvov, whom he liked so much, and Sergey Ivanovitch, and all the women believed, and his wife believed as simply as he had believed in his earliest childhood, and ninety-nine hundredths of the Russian people, all the working people for whose life he felt the deepest respect, believed. Another fact of which he became convinced, after reading many scientific books, was that the men who shared his views had no other construction to put on them, and that they gave no explanation of the questions which he felt he could not live without answering, but simply ignored their existence and attempted to explain other questions of no possible interest to him, such as the evolution of organisms, the materialistic theory of consciousness, and so forth. Moreover, during his wife’s confinement, something had happened that seemed extraordinary to him. He, an unbeliever, had fallen into praying, and at the moment he prayed, he believed. But that moment had passed, and he could not make his state of mind at that moment fit into the rest of his life. He could not admit that at that moment he knew the truth, and that now he was wrong; for as soon as he began thinking calmly about it, it all fell to pieces. He could not admit that he was mistaken then, for his spiritual condition then was precious to him, and to admit that it was a proof of weakness would have been to desecrate those moments. He was miserably divided against himself, and strained all his spiritual forces to the utmost to escape from this condition.
Source text: Project Gutenberg #1399. Public domain worldwide. Translated by Constance Garnett (1901)
Modern English
Select a style above to load the modern English translation.

This chapter functions as an extended interior monologue that maps the precise contours of Levin's spiritual crisis. Tolstoy structures the passage as a series of failed intellectual moves: Levin tries materialism, finds it empty; tries to imitate the serenity of his peers, finds it inauthentic; tries to dismiss the prayer episode, finds he cannot do so without self-betrayal. The cumulative effect is a portrait of a mind that is rigorous enough to reject easy consolations but not yet capable of constructing a new foundation — a condition Tolstoy treats with deep sympathy rather than satire.

The chapter's most celebrated device is the extended simile of the fur cloak exchanged for muslin in the frost. The image is visceral and pre-rational: Levin is convinced of his nakedness 'not by reason, but by his whole nature.' This phrasing is thematically crucial. Tolstoy is already signalling that the resolution to Levin's crisis will not come through argument but through a different, bodily or intuitive mode of knowing — a preparation for the peasant Fyodor's remark in the following chapters.

The epistemological paradox surrounding the prayer scene is handled with particular subtlety. Levin cannot accept that he was right then and wrong now, nor that he was weak then and clear-headed now. The two positions are logically symmetrical, and Tolstoy refuses to resolve the symmetry cheaply. This intellectual honesty distinguishes Levin from the complacent materialists around him and marks him as a genuine seeker — a figure in the tradition of the spiritual pilgrim whose suffering is itself a form of moral seriousness.

Tolstoy also uses social contrast to deepen the analysis. The educated circle's serene godlessness is juxtaposed with the faith of 'ninety-nine hundredths of the Russian people' and of every morally admirable person Levin knows — the old prince, Lvov, Sergey Ivanovitch, Kitty. This is not a simple populist argument; Tolstoy is noting that the correlation between goodness and belief is an empirical datum Levin cannot explain away, and that the absence of belief correlates with a kind of moral vacancy in the educated class.

The toy shops and tool shops metaphor reinforces the epistemological theme: scientific answers address questions Levin is not asking. The image implies a category error at the heart of positivism — it is not that science is wrong but that it is answering the wrong questions. This anticipates the novel's broader critique of rationalism as an insufficient guide to living, and aligns Tolstoy's own philosophical position with the intuitive, experiential knowledge that Levin is about to discover.

Loading quotes...

Loading tags...

Ask the Reader

Click any tag to explore where it appears across the book, then ask the Reader to explain how it works in this chapter.

Exploring tag...
The Reader's Take
Ask the Reader to explain how this element appears in this chapter
Click a tag to search.
Ask the Reader about this chapter
Type at least 2 characters to search
Characters & Figures
Loading figures...
✎ Mr. Shifflett's Note
SIS Teachers
Sign in with your @siskorea.org email for free full access to this guide and all GradeWise study guides — every chapter, translation, and premium feature.
Sign In with SIS Email