Anna Karenina Study Guide
Color Theme
Font Style
Sans Serif System Mono Accessible
Text Size

Part Eight, Chapter 10

Chapter Summary

Back at Pokrovskoe for the summer, Levin immerses himself in the practical rhythms of estate management, family care, peasant relations, and a new bee-keeping hobby. He no longer attempts to justify these activities through abstract principles of the general good, as he once did; instead he acts from an unexamined but unshakeable sense of necessity, finding that this narrower, more personal engagement succeeds where his earlier idealistic efforts failed.

The chapter catalogues the moral texture of Levin's daily decisions—when to lend money, when to exact penalties, when to defer to his wife over waiting peasants—showing that an inner, instinctive judge guides each choice. Yet Levin remains intellectually tormented: he cannot answer what he is or why he lives, fears the despair might drive him to suicide, and yet continues to act with complete resolution along a self-defined path.

Translation Style
✨ Character Voice Translations PREMIUM
Original Text
When Levin thought what he was and what he was living for, he could find no answer to the questions and was reduced to despair, but he left off questioning himself about it. It seemed as though he knew both what he was and for what he was living, for he acted and lived resolutely and without hesitation. Indeed, in these latter days he was far more decided and unhesitating in life than he had ever been. When he went back to the country at the beginning of June, he went back also to his usual pursuits. The management of the estate, his relations with the peasants and the neighbors, the care of his household, the management of his sister’s and brother’s property, of which he had the direction, his relations with his wife and kindred, the care of his child, and the new bee-keeping hobby he had taken up that spring, filled all his time. These things occupied him now, not because he justified them to himself by any sort of general principles, as he had done in former days; on the contrary, disappointed by the failure of his former efforts for the general welfare, and too much occupied with his own thought and the mass of business with which he was burdened from all sides, he had completely given up thinking of the general good, and he busied himself with all this work simply because it seemed to him that he must do what he was doing—that he could not do otherwise. In former days—almost from childhood, and increasingly up to full manhood—when he had tried to do anything that would be good for all, for humanity, for Russia, for the whole village, he had noticed that the idea of it had been pleasant, but the work itself had always been incoherent, that then he had never had a full conviction of its absolute necessity, and that the work that had begun by seeming so great, had grown less and less, till it vanished into nothing. But now, since his marriage, when he had begun to confine himself more and more to living for himself, though he experienced no delight at all at the thought of the work he was doing, he felt a complete conviction of its necessity, saw that it succeeded far better than in old days, and that it kept on growing more and more. Now, involuntarily it seemed, he cut more and more deeply into the soil like a plough, so that he could not be drawn out without turning aside the furrow. To live the same family life as his father and forefathers—that is, in the same condition of culture—and to bring up his children in the same, was incontestably necessary. It was as necessary as dining when one was hungry. And to do this, just as it was necessary to cook dinner, it was necessary to keep the mechanism of agriculture at Pokrovskoe going so as to yield an income. Just as incontestably as it was necessary to repay a debt was it necessary to keep the property in such a condition that his son, when he received it as a heritage, would say “thank you” to his father as Levin had said “thank you” to his grandfather for all he built and planted. And to do this it was necessary to look after the land himself, not to let it, and to breed cattle, manure the fields, and plant timber. It was impossible not to look after the affairs of Sergey Ivanovitch, of his sister, of the peasants who came to him for advice and were accustomed to do so—as impossible as to fling down a child one is carrying in one’s arms. It was necessary to look after the comfort of his sister-in-law and her children, and of his wife and baby, and it was impossible not to spend with them at least a short time each day. And all this, together with shooting and his new bee-keeping, filled up the whole of Levin’s life, which had no meaning at all for him, when he began to think. But besides knowing thoroughly what he had to do, Levin knew in just the same way how he had to do it all, and what was more important than the rest. He knew he must hire laborers as cheaply as possible; but to hire men under bond, paying them in advance at less than the current rate of wages, was what he must not do, even though it was very profitable. Selling straw to the peasants in times of scarcity of provender was what he might do, even though he felt sorry for them; but the tavern and the pothouse must be put down, though they were a source of income. Felling timber must be punished as severely as possible, but he could not exact forfeits for cattle being driven onto his fields; and though it annoyed the keeper and made the peasants not afraid to graze their cattle on his land, he could not keep their cattle as a punishment. To Pyotr, who was paying a money-lender ten per cent. a month, he must lend a sum of money to set him free. But he could not let off peasants who did not pay their rent, nor let them fall into arrears. It was impossible to overlook the bailiff’s not having mown the meadows and letting the hay spoil; and it was equally impossible to mow those acres where a young copse had been planted. It was impossible to excuse a laborer who had gone home in the busy season because his father was dying, however sorry he might feel for him, and he must subtract from his pay those costly months of idleness. But it was impossible not to allow monthly rations to the old servants who were of no use for anything. Levin knew that when he got home he must first of all go to his wife, who was unwell, and that the peasants who had been waiting for three hours to see him could wait a little longer. He knew too that, regardless of all the pleasure he felt in taking a swarm, he must forego that pleasure, and leave the old man to see to the bees alone, while he talked to the peasants who had come after him to the bee-house. Whether he were acting rightly or wrongly he did not know, and far from trying to prove that he was, nowadays he avoided all thought or talk about it. Reasoning had brought him to doubt, and prevented him from seeing what he ought to do and what he ought not. When he did not think, but simply lived, he was continually aware of the presence of an infallible judge in his soul, determining which of two possible courses of action was the better and which was the worse, and as soon as he did not act rightly, he was at once aware of it. So he lived, not knowing and not seeing any chance of knowing what he was and what he was living for, and harassed at this lack of knowledge to such a point that he was afraid of suicide, and yet firmly laying down his own individual definite path in life.
Source text: Project Gutenberg #1399. Public domain worldwide. Translated by Constance Garnett (1901)
Modern English
Select a style above to load the modern English translation.

This chapter functions as a precise psychological portrait of Levin at a transitional moment: he has abandoned the Enlightenment faith in rational self-justification without yet arriving at the spiritual revelation that will close the novel. Tolstoy structures the chapter around a paradox—Levin acts with more conviction than ever precisely because he has stopped asking why he acts. The narrative voice enacts this paradox formally, moving between sweeping generalisation ('he knew both what he was and for what he was living') and immediate qualification ('he could find no answer'), so that the reader inhabits Levin's contradictory consciousness rather than merely observing it.

The extended plough simile—'he cut more and more deeply into the soil like a plough, so that he could not be drawn out without turning aside the furrow'—is the chapter's governing image. It fuses Levin's agrarian identity with his moral and psychological condition: rootedness is simultaneously productive and constraining, a mark of integrity and of the impossibility of abstract detachment. The image also quietly recalls the earlier scenes of Levin mowing with the peasants, linking physical labour to existential authenticity throughout the novel.

Tolstoy's catalogue of Levin's ethical micro-decisions—lending to Pyotr, punishing timber-felling, allowing rations to old servants—performs a crucial thematic function. By listing these cases in rapid, almost legalistic succession, Tolstoy demonstrates that practical moral wisdom is irreducible to any single principle. Each decision is contextual, relational, and felt rather than reasoned. This anticipates the novel's eventual argument that lived ethical knowledge is prior to and richer than philosophical ethics, a position Tolstoy would develop systematically in his later religious writings.

The figure of the infallible inner judge is philosophically significant. It echoes Kantian moral intuition but strips away Kant's rational scaffolding: Levin's judge operates 'when he did not think, but simply lived.' Tolstoy is positioning conscience as pre-rational and somatic, closer to the Orthodox concept of the heart (serdtse) as the seat of moral perception than to Western rationalist ethics. The judge's authority is confirmed negatively—Levin knows immediately when he has acted wrongly—which aligns with Tolstoy's broader suspicion of positive, systematic moral programmes.

The chapter closes on a deliberately unresolved note: Levin is 'harassed at this lack of knowledge to such a point that he was afraid of suicide, and yet firmly laying down his own individual definite path in life.' The juxtaposition of existential dread and practical resolution is not ironic but tragic in the classical sense—it reveals the cost of consciousness. By placing this admission immediately before the novel's spiritual climax, Tolstoy ensures that Levin's eventual insight will be understood as a genuine answer to genuine anguish, not a comfortable platitude.

Loading quotes...

Loading tags...

Ask the Reader

Click any tag to explore where it appears across the book, then ask the Reader to explain how it works in this chapter.

Exploring tag...
The Reader's Take
Ask the Reader to explain how this element appears in this chapter
Click a tag to search.
Ask the Reader about this chapter
Type at least 2 characters to search
Characters & Figures
Loading figures...
✎ Mr. Shifflett's Note
SIS Teachers
Sign in with your @siskorea.org email for free full access to this guide and all GradeWise study guides — every chapter, translation, and premium feature.
Sign In with SIS Email